Latest in the fight for global pension parity
PARITY-WARRIOR WILL REOPEN UNDER NEW EDITORIAL STAFF.
CONTACT DETAILS WILL BE AVAILABLE SHORTLY.
OPEN TO RECIPIANTSIOF THE UK STATE PENSIONERS, WORKERS AND SUPPORTERS.
WE SUPPORT ALL INDIVIDUALS,GROUPS CAMPAIGNING FOR PENSION PARITY AND PENSION REFORM.
WE DO NOT SUPPORT PARTIAL UPRATIBG GOING FORWARD.
OPEN TO ALL RECIPIENTS OF THE UK STATE PENSION WORLD- WIDE.
OPEN TO WORKERS IN THE UK THAT ARE FUTURE PENSIONERS.
WE SUPPORT THE AIMS OF ALL GROUPS CAMPAIGNING FOR PENSION PARITY,
PENSION REFORM, RIGHTING THE WRONGS OF GOVERNMENT DISCRIMINATION.
WE SUPPORT EQUALITY, FAIRNESS AND JUSTICE FOR PENSIONERS AND EXPATS.
WE CAMPAIGN FOR OUR PENSION THAT IS AN ENTITLEMENT, WE PAID FOR
BY THE CONTRIBUTIONS WE PAID FROM OUR SALARIES.
IT IS NOT A BENEFIT PAID FROM INCOME TAX.( what they tell you is a fabrication!)
it is an entitlement. Help us by telling us how and why it is an entitlment.
On 21 June 2022. YAHOO! HEADLINE.(on line) SAID:
NUMBER 1O. 10 DEFENDS INFLATION-BUSTING RISE FOR PENSIONERS BUT NOT PUBLIC WORKERS.
RETIREES ARE SET TO SEE DOUBLE-DIGIT PAYMENTS INCREASES NEXT YEAR.
one of the many pension reform groups,
EMAILED YAHOO (NEWS) VIA email@example.com :
No 10 FAILED TO SAY 500,000 RETIREES WILL NOT GET THAT INCREASE.
They will not receive a penny more. Those 500,000 are just half of the 1.1 million recipients of the UK state pension that live overseas*. Those 500,000 PENSIONERS HAVE NEVER HAD A PENNY INCREASE SINCE THEY MOVED OVERSEAS, OR COMMENCED THEIR PENSION IN THEIR CHOSEN COUNTRY OF RESIDENCE.
EVEN WAR VETERANS THAT PUT THEIR LIVES ON THE LINE IN WW2, STILL LIVING ON LESS THAN £40 P/W PENSION. The gov’t froze the pension of those 500,000 saying they only uprate pensions where there is a legal requirement to do so. (It is discrimination).That in reality is not true. The uprating is done by secondary domestic legislation. No agreement with overseas countries is actually required.
*The other 600,000" will get the full increase as they do every year.
COMPLAIN STRONGLY TO THE PRESS. DEMAND ACCURACY ON HEADLINES.
KEEP COMPLAINING! post it on Faceook and advise all to also complain.
KEEP DEMANDING FOR THE INVESTAGATIVE JOURNALIST TO DIG DEEP AND DEEPER AT EVERY OPPERTUNITY. COMPLAN TO LOCAL NEWSPAPERS AS WLL AS NATIONALS.
IS THE GOV'T SUPRESSING THE FREEDOM OF THE PRESS?
SHOULD THE ELECTORATE BE PRESING THE GOV'T AND THE PRESS HARDER ?
IF YOU SAY YES,
THEN STAND UP, SPEAK UP, AND FIGHT
THIS TYPE OF DICTATORSHIP THAT IS NOT ACCEPTABLE.
FIGHT FOR YOUR RIGHTS. RESPOND TO NEWSPAPER ARTICLEES. OR OTHER ITEMS. CHASE MINISTERS AND MP's
STAND UP, SPEAK UP!
the government has targeted all pensioners in the uk and overseas.
also uk expats. workers that retire will be on list.
THE UK STATE PENSION. The State Pension Reformation issues
The site will remain as completely independent as possible from any one group with opportunity to take on today’s problems.
The number of UK pensioners is around 12.5 million. There are around 30 odd million workers in the UK that will become pensioners.
42 MILLION PEOPLE WORKING TOGETHER AS ONE UNIT IS A GOOD CHALLENGING NUMBER TO TAKE ON THE UK GOV’T PENSION ERRORS AND FAULTS!
This site is NOT a challenge to any established pension related group. The idea is to get 42 million people agreeing on correcting gov’t failures.
(e.g. 42 million people agreeing the frozen pension policy must end. The SPA should not be increased above 68 or reduced to 66 etc. etc. 42 million people stating all pensioners information is directed at all pensioners and workers directly).
It’s all for our and future pensioners secured pension as conceived by D. L George in the early 1900’s. if you want your secured pension then can we all work together?
1) A suggestion to create a catalogue of pension reformation groups. Purely a list of groups that are actively working on reform of SP issues. Possibly a contact email address could be added. No details of activities other than main agenda item “expert” in. (i.e the list is not an advertising board for other issues).
All groups have their own agenda and therefore not all groups will necessarily have the same ideas on individual SP issues. Each single issue would therefore need tobe covered separately. (groups with Facebook accounts will carry on as usual).
2) the SP is an issue itself and needs to be taken as first priority. Next stage to do that is to determine what is the SP. ( I am working on that one). Each group would ask its members to confirm agreement, by a date limited email address, to the group organiser. The organiser would collate numbers and send to a date limited email address of an agreed recipient. Agreement not received by the email closure date, or after that date, would be assumed to be “not in agreement”.
e.g. Q1 QUESTIONNAIRE RE SP STATUS.
(it would be necessary to twist a few arms perhaps to get all members to agree to the question by replying). As with the current Pension Act there will be provisions that would similarly apply within the “State Pension Reformation Act”.
Questions following should be kept to minimum. SPA will be a blocking issue by the gov’t so should not be used in with other main issues. However I would think there would be a big dum age to be agreed on, perhaps 68 would be possible. (still think it should be on single main SPA issue only. The reformation of the SPA will be a long and difficult battle and so small steps should be taken. Concentrate on the primary target, the SP basics, and then other single issues.
A) wIll you agree the SP should NOT be part of the welfare state legislation definitions? It is an entitlement and a right and should therfore be a standalone item? The pimary legislation wording would state, as existing: “All persons are entitled to receive the SP on reaching SP age and have the required number of contributory years. ( As defined in this legislation), regardless of their country of residence. The number of contributory years cannot be changed within 10 years of the enactment of the legislation of this SP Act.
No decondary legislation should change the primary legislation.
ALL PROPOSED CHANGES SHOULD BE MADE BY PRIMARY LEGISLATION ONLY.
The SP must be converted to being just one rate only, within say 3 years (?). The rate of the SP to be increased almost immediately to reduce other benefit claims and administrative costs.
Certainly a big demand must be that the NIS funds MUST be reinstated as a secured fund as now, (was), the format to follow the original “assurance of a pension from retiring from work until death” as conceived by David Lloyd George.
Brians “parity Warrior” was based on the FP. But after a decade or so being manipulated by the gov’t there are a few additions to be added, such as 2). British Expat Shame! 3). British Government Shame! 4). Recipients of the British State Pension Shame! 5). Failure of campaigning group Shame! 6) The Commonwealth Shame! 7). The State Pension Age Shame! 8).The legislation Shame! 9).The failures of the government by maladministration on all pension related issues shame!”
“LET THE AIM BE FOR THAT 40 MILLION PEOPLE TO BE INVOLVED.
WE AIM TO STICK TO PROVEN FACTS AND LEGISLATION. PLEASE DO THE SAME